The Fund will Depend on the Managerial Expertise of the Adviser, the Antares Lending Platform and Their Respective Personnel. The shareholders will generally not make decisions with respect to the management, disposition or other realization of any Portfolio Loans. Consequently, the success of the Fund’s investments will depend, in large part, on the skill and expertise of the shared personnel of the Adviser who are employees of Antares Capital and who are responsible for originating, underwriting, monitoring and managing loans on behalf of the Antares Direct Holdings and on behalf of the Adviser for the Fund and other client accounts, including funds, vehicles, joint ventures, loan programs, special purpose entities, warehouses, CLOs, co-investment vehicles, and other entities and accounts sponsored, managed, serviced or advised by the Adviser and its affiliates, including Antares Strategic Credit Fund and Antares Strategic Credit Fund II LLC (collectively “Other Accounts”).

The Adviser has access to personnel who act as shared personnel of the Adviser Parties and are employees of Antares Capital. Such shared personnel underwrite, monitor and manage loans on behalf of the Antares Direct Holdings, on behalf of the Adviser for the Fund, and on behalf of the Adviser, and affiliates of the Adviser (including Antares Capital) for Other Accounts. In providing services through the Adviser, such shared personnel are supervised by the Adviser and subject to the Adviser’s compliance policies and procedures, including a code of ethics and applicable provisions of the Advisers Act. There can be no assurance that the current professionals will continue to serve in their current positions, continue to be employed by Antares Capital or made available to the Adviser or continue to be shared personnel or authorized persons of the Adviser and the other Adviser Parties. In addition, individuals not currently associated with any of the Adviser Parties may become associated with the Adviser or other Adviser Parties, and the performance of the Portfolio Loans would then also depend on the financial and managerial experience of such individuals. Although the Adviser’s investment professionals will devote such time as they determine in their discretion is reasonably necessary to fulfill the Adviser’s obligations to the Fund, they will not devote all of their professional time to the affairs of the Fund. When acting on behalf of the Adviser, such shared personnel will also be providing services to others, including to proprietary accounts of the Adviser Parties and to Other Accounts. When acting on behalf of any particular party, Adviser Parties or Other Accounts, such shared personnel have an obligation to pursue the best interests of the party on whose behalf they are acting at the time, whose interests could diverge from the best interests of the Fund. In some cases, this can adversely impact the availability or terms of Portfolio Loans in which the Fund ultimately invests.

The Fund is Dependent on Information Systems and Subject to Risks Relating to Cybersecurity. Our business is dependent on our and third parties’ communications and information systems. Cybersecurity incidents, cyberattacks, and other breaches have been occurring globally at a more frequent and severe level and will likely continue to increase in frequency and severity in the future. The Adviser, the Fund, their respective service providers, and other market participants increasingly depend on complex information technology and communications systems to conduct business functions and therefore have become increasingly prone to operational and information security risks resulting from cyberattacks and other security incidents. These systems are subject to a number of different threats or risks that could adversely affect the Fund and the shareholders, despite the efforts of the Adviser, the Fund and their respective service providers to adopt technologies, processes and practices intended to mitigate these risks and protect the security of their computer systems, software, networks and other technology assets, as well as the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information (including personal data) belonging to or in the possession or control of the Fund and the shareholders. For example, unauthorized third parties (including members of organized crime, hackers, terrorists, and other external parties, including foreign state and state-supported actors) may attempt to improperly access, modify, disrupt the operations of, or prevent access to the systems and networks of the Adviser, the Fund, their respective service providers, or their counterparties, or data within these systems and networks.

Cybersecurity threats are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly sophisticated and complex, increasing the difficulty of defending against them. Cybersecurity incidents and malicious internet-based activity are also becoming more frequent, and providers of investment management services have been targeted by such attacks, which include, among other things, stealing or corrupting data maintained online or digitally, denial-of-service attacks, malicious or destructive code, phishing attacks, malware, ransomware, social engineering, damage or interruption from computer viruses, the unauthorized collection, monitoring, use or release or other processing of confidential, proprietary, sensitive or other non-public information (including personal data), employee error or malfeasance, and causing operational disruption. Third parties also may attempt to fraudulently induce employees, customers, third party service providers, or other users of the Adviser’s, the Fund’s and their respective service providers’ systems to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to the Adviser’s data or that of the Fund’s investors. Such threats could see their frequency increased, and effectiveness enhanced, by the use of artificial intelligence.

Artificial Intelligence. The Fund, the Adviser, the Adviser Parties, the Antares Lending Platform, the borrowers and issuers in which the Fund invests and/or the Fund’s service providers could benefit from novel uses of artificial intelligence (“AI”), including generative AI, into their businesses and operations. However, there are significant risks involved in utilizing AI, and no assurance can be provided that such use will enhance the businesses or operations, or result in such businesses or operations being more efficient or profitable. For example, AI algorithms could be flawed, insufficient, of poor quality, reflect unwanted forms of bias, or contain other errors or inadequacies, any of which may not be easily detectable. AI has also been known to produce false or “hallucinatory” inferences or outputs and AI can present ethical issues and subject users to new or heightened legal, regulatory, ethical, or other challenges. Inappropriate or controversial data practices by developers and end-users, or other factors adversely affecting public opinion of AI, could impair the acceptance of AI solutions. If the AI solutions that the Adviser Parties create or use are deficient, inaccurate or controversial, the Adviser Parties and/or the Fund could suffer operational inefficiencies, competitive harm, legal liability, brand or reputational harm, or other adverse impacts on their businesses and financial results. If the party using AI does not have sufficient rights to use the data or other material or content on which its AI solutions or other AI tools rely, such party could also incur liability through the violation of applicable laws, third-party intellectual property, privacy or other rights, or contracts to which they are a party. At this time, the Adviser Parties and the Antares Lending Platform primarily use AI, in the context of their investment activities, to expedite certain tasks that consolidate and synthesize information that is then checked by personnel and informs the investment process but, at this time, the Adviser Parties are not using AI to make investment decisions or as an analytical tool to aid such decisions. The Adviser Parties and the Antares Lending Platform could alter, increase or decrease their use of AI in the future.

In addition, regulation of AI is rapidly evolving worldwide as legislators and regulators are increasingly focused on this emerging technology. The technologies underlying AI and its uses are already subject to a variety of laws, including intellectual property, privacy, data protection and cybersecurity, consumer protection, competition, and equal opportunity laws, and are expected to be subject to increased regulation and new laws or new applications of existing laws. AI is the subject of ongoing review by various U.S. governmental and regulatory agencies, and various U.S. states and other non-U.S. jurisdictions are applying, or are considering applying, their platform moderation, cybersecurity, and data protection laws to AI or are considering general legal frameworks for AI, such as the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act. It is possible that the Fund, the Adviser Parties or the Antares Lending Platform or any of their respective affiliates will not be able to anticipate how to respond to these rapidly evolving frameworks, and such parties could be required to expend resources to adjust their activity in certain jurisdictions if the legal frameworks are inconsistent across jurisdictions. Furthermore, because AI technology itself is highly complex and rapidly developing, it is not possible to predict all of the legal, operational or technological risks that may arise relating to the use of AI.

The Fund is Reliant on the Adviser and is Subject to Risks Relating to the Fact that Shareholders do not Participate in Management. Substantially all decisions with respect to the management of the Fund are made exclusively by the Board and/or the Adviser. Subject to the provisions of the Advisory Agreement and the approval of the Board (where applicable), all investment and sale decisions with respect to the Portfolio Loans on behalf of the Fund are made by the Adviser. Further, the Adviser may delegate all or a portion of its obligations pursuant to and in accordance with the Advisory Agreement. Shareholders have no right or power to take part in the management of the Fund. Consequently, the success of the Fund will depend, in large part, upon the skill and expertise of the officers or other authorized persons of the Fund and the officers or other personnel of the Adviser. There can be no assurance that the officers or other authorized persons of the Fund or the officers or other personnel of the Adviser will continue to serve in their current positions or continue to serve as officers or other authorized persons of the Fund or as officers or other personnel of the Adviser, as the case may be. Further, there can be no assurance that any particular individual will be involved in the management of any particular portfolio for any given period of time, if at all.

The Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective will depend on the Adviser’s ability to identify, invest in and monitor Portfolio Loans. The members of the Adviser’s Investment Committee and the other officers and personnel of the Adviser are engaged in other business activities and will be called upon to provide managerial assistance to Other Accounts managed by the Adviser or by other Adviser Parties and to Platform Balance Sheet Clients. Although such investment professionals will devote such time as is necessary to fulfill the obligations of the Adviser to the Fund effectively, as reasonably determined by the Adviser, respectively, they will not devote all of their professional time thereto. In addition, there is no assurance that every member of the Adviser’s Investment Committee will opine on any particular investment opportunity. In particular, (i) the Adviser’s Investment Committee meets with a quorum and reviews and approves a prospective Portfolio Loan, such that it is possible that the Adviser’s Investment Committee will opine on an investment opportunity without receiving input from each member and (ii) members of the Adviser’s Investment Committee can, consistent with the committee’s charter, delegate authority with respect to a prospective Portfolio Loan to another employee of the Adviser or one of its affiliates.

Shareholders and the Board will have the right to terminate the Advisory Agreement. If the Adviser is removed, or resigns, the Fund will lose access to additional Loans or other assets originated by the Antares Lending Platform, which represent all of the Fund’s portfolio. Additionally, if the Adviser resigns or is removed, the Fund may not be able to find a substitute investment adviser or be able to hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms or at all. If the Fund is unable to replace the Adviser quickly, its operations are likely to experience a disruption, and its financial condition is likely to be adversely affected. In addition, the coordination of the Fund’s internal management and investment activities is likely to suffer if the Fund is unable to identify and reach an agreement with a single institution or group of executives having the expertise possessed by the Adviser and the other Adviser Parties. Even if the Fund is able to retain comparable management, whether internal or external, transition of management may result in additional costs and time delays that may adversely affect the Fund’s financial condition.

Investors Need to Seek Independent Advice. None of the Fund, the Adviser, any other Adviser Party or the Antares Lending Platform is providing investment, accounting, tax or legal advice in respect of the Common Shares and none of them will have a fiduciary relationship with any investor or prospective investor. No hypothetical performance scenario, modeling run or return analysis that is provided to any prospective investor should be solely relied upon when considering an investment decision.

The actual performance of the Fund will be affected by, among other things, (i) approvals required by the Declaration of Trust of the Fund or the Advisory Agreement, as applicable, that are granted or withheld by the Board including, among other things, in connection with the purchase and sale of Portfolio Loans, (ii) the amount and frequency of principal payments and prepayments on the Portfolio Loans, which are dependent upon, among other things, the amount of payments received at or in advance of the scheduled maturity of the Portfolio Loans (whether through sale, maturity, optional or mandatory prepayments, default or the other disposition or liquidation thereof), (iii) the financial condition of the obligors of the Portfolio Loans, (iv) the availability of repricings and/or refinancing of the Portfolio Loans, (v) changes to the interest rates on the Portfolio Loans, and (vi) the availability to the Fund of leveraged financing with respect to the Portfolio Loans or any portion thereof. It is expected that most of the Portfolio Loans will include the right of the obligor to optionally prepay such Portfolio Loan, in whole or in part, and/or the obligation to make a mandatory prepayment of such Portfolio Loan, in whole or in part, at various times and subject to certain conditions.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Relating to Limited Liquidity. Currently, no market exists for the Common Shares. The Common Shares are illiquid investments; there is no established secondary market for the Common Shares and none is likely to develop. An investment in the Fund is suitable only for certain sophisticated investors that have no need for immediate liquidity in respect of their investment and who can accept the risks associated with investing in illiquid investments.

Liquidity for our Common Shares will be limited to participation in our share repurchase program, which we have no obligation to maintain. To the extent you paid a repurchase price that includes the related sales load and to the extent you have the ability to sell your Common Shares pursuant to our share repurchase program, the price at which you may sell Common Shares may be lower than the amount you paid in connection with the purchase of Common Shares in this offering.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Relating to Use of Leverage. The Fund will use leverage and incur indebtedness directly or indirectly to acquire and hold Portfolio Loans. The Adviser may establish and use any reserves to acquire additional Portfolio Loans or other or to repay all or any portion of any outstanding indebtedness of the Fund. Risks associated with this use of leverage are described under the heading “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Financings by the Fund”.

To the extent that the Fund enters into multiple financing arrangements, such arrangements may contain cross-default provisions that could magnify the effect of a default. If a cross-default provision were exercised, this could result in a substantial loss for the Fund.

As a BDC, we generally will be required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets to total borrowings and other senior securities, which include all of our borrowings, including those incurred at a subsidiary level, and any preferred shares that we may issue in the future, of at least 150%. As defined in the 1940 Act, asset coverage of 150% means that for every $100 of net assets we hold, we may raise $200 from borrowing and issuing senior securities. In addition, while any senior securities remain outstanding, we will be required to make provisions to prohibit any distribution to our shareholders or the repurchase of such securities or shares unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase. If this ratio were to fall below 150%, we could not incur additional debt and could be required to sell a portion of our investments to repay some debt when it is disadvantageous to do so. This could have a material adverse effect on our operations and investment activities. Moreover, our ability to make distributions to you may be significantly restricted or we may not be able to make any such distributions whatsoever. The amount of leverage that we will employ will be subject to oversight by our Board, a majority of whom are Independent Trustees with no material interests in such transactions.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Relating to Portfolio Valuation. The Fund expects to hold Portfolio Loans, equity securities and other financial instruments, assets or obligations that are thinly traded, not publicly traded, for which no market exists or which are restricted as to their transferability under applicable securities laws. The fair value of such investments will not be readily determinable and can be extremely difficult to value accurately. The Adviser, subject at all times to the oversight and approval of the Board, will determine the valuation of the Fund’s investments. It is expected that the Adviser will have a limited ability to obtain accurate market quotations for purposes of valuing most of the Fund’s investments, which may require the Adviser to estimate, in accordance with valuation policies established by the Board, the value of the Fund’s debt and other investments on a valuation date. Further, because of the overall size and concentrations in particular markets, the maturities of positions that may be held by the Fund from time to time and other factors, the liquidation values of the Fund’s investments may differ significantly from the interim valuations of these investments derived from the valuation methods described herein. If the Adviser’s valuation should prove to be incorrect, the stated value of the Fund’s investments could be adversely affected. Absent bad faith or manifest error, valuation determinations of the Adviser will be conclusive and binding on the shareholders.

Valuation of the types of assets in which the Fund invests are inherently subjective. In addition, the Adviser may have an interest in determining higher valuations in order to be able to present better performance to prospective investors. In certain cases, the Fund may hold an investment in an issuer experiencing distress or going through bankruptcy. In such a situation, the Adviser may continue to place a favorable valuation on such investment due to the Adviser’s determination that the investment is sufficiently secured despite the distressed state or bankruptcy of the issuer. However, no assurances can be given that this assumption is justified or that such valuations will be accurate in the long term. In addition, an investment in a portfolio company may not be permanently written-off or permanently written down despite its distressed state or covenant breach until such portfolio company experiences a material corporate event (e.g., bankruptcy or partial sale) which establishes an objective basis for such revised valuation. In these circumstances, the Adviser has an interest in delaying any such write-offs or write-downs to maintain a higher management fee base and thus, management fees paid to the Adviser.

In addition, the Adviser may rely on third-party valuation agents to verify the value of certain investments. An investment may not have a readily ascertainable market value and accordingly, could potentially make it difficult to determine a fair value of an investment and may yield an inaccurate valuation. Further, because of the Adviser’s knowledge of the investment, the valuation agent may defer to the Adviser’s valuation even where such valuation may not be accurate or the determination thereof involved a conflict of interest. The Adviser also relies on the accuracy of data and information provided by portfolio companies in the valuation process. An inaccurate valuation of one or more investments could have a substantial impact on the Fund.

There are Investment Limitations Related to Antares Capital’s Environmental, Social and Governance Policy. Loans originated by (i) Antares Capital, as originator and lender of loans, (ii) Antares Capital, as arranger, administrative agent and/or similar capacities for loans, and (iii) the Antares Lending Platform are done so in accordance with Antares Capital’s Environmental, Social and Governance policy (such policy as amended from time to time, the “Antares ESG Policy”). The Antares ESG Policy sets forth the Antares Lending Platform’s principal positions on environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters and reviews how ESG factors are incorporated into the Antares Lending Platform’s loan and investment processes. ESG factors that the Adviser evaluates could include: (i) environment, (ii) social capital, (iii) human capital, (iv) business model and innovation, and (v) leadership and corporate governance. In considering the materiality of any ESG factor, the Adviser considers the borrower’s exposure to ESG risk, the borrower’s organizational capacity to mitigate that risk; and the potential outcomes from an adverse ESG event. Generally, ESG factors are informative but not determinative, although there are certain industries in which the Adviser will not invest depending on the specific investor/client, jurisdiction, or investor/client mandate. The Antares Capital Responsible Investment Policy (“RI Policy”) guides portfolio management and general business conduct on the integration of any ESG factors when deemed appropriate. Given the dynamic and evolving nature of ESG issues, the RI Policy is subject to continuous review and subject to change without notice; and its application can vary materially depending on the specific investor or client, jurisdiction, or investor level investment guidelines and requirements. The Adviser and/or its advisory affiliates could offer new or different strategies to current or prospective clients, including private funds or funds of one dedicated to a strategy or which pursue such strategy alongside other investments, such as secondary market acquisition of interests in funds that pursue private credit strategies or direct investment in junior capital instruments, although such investments are not generally within the Fund’s expected portfolio profile.

It is possible that the Antares ESG Policy will prevent potential Portfolio Loans from being originated on the Antares Lending Platform or prevent the Fund from acquiring certain Portfolio Loans, which could impact the returns of the Fund. Except as set forth in the Antares ESG Policy, the Adviser is not required to consider any particular ESG factors in evaluating investments. There is no universally accepted view on ESG standards, and the Adviser’s view as to any ESG factors might not match the view of any particular shareholder.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Relating to Insurance. The Adviser and/or its affiliates expect to purchase and maintain an omnibus insurance policy which includes coverage in respect of the Fund, the Adviser and their affiliates, as well as other clients, including certain of their respective indemnified persons (which omnibus insurance policy or policies may provide coverage to the Adviser, the Adviser and their affiliates, as applicable, for events unrelated to the Fund). The premiums for such shared insurance policies generally would be borne by the Adviser and the clients covered by such policies, and such shared insurance policies are expected to have an overall cap on coverage for all the insured parties thereunder. To the extent an insurable event results in claims in excess of such cap, the Fund may not receive as much in insurance proceeds as it would have received if separate insurance policies had been purchased for each insured party. Similarly, insurable events may occur sequentially in time while subject to a single overall cap. To the extent insurance proceeds for one such event are applied towards a cap and the Fund experiences an insurable loss after such event, the Fund’s receipts from such insurance policy may also be diminished. Insurance policies covering the Fund, the premiums of which are paid in whole or in part by the Fund, may provide insurance coverage to indemnified persons for conduct that would not be covered by indemnification. In addition, the Fund may need to initiate litigation in order to collect from an insurance provider, which may be lengthy and expensive for the Fund and which ultimately may not result in a financial award. In addition, the Adviser may cause the Fund to purchase and maintain insurance coverage that provides coverage to the Fund, certain indemnified persons, or the Adviser, in which case, the premiums would be borne by the Fund.

While the Adviser and its affiliates expect to allocate insurance expenses in a manner it determines to be fair and equitable, taking into account any factors they deems relevant to the allocation of such expenses, because of the uncertainty of whether claims will arise in the future and the timing and the amount that may be involved in any such claim, the determination of how to allocate such expenses may require the Adviser and its affiliates to take into consideration facts and circumstances that are subjective in nature. It is unlikely that the Adviser and its affiliates will be able to accurately allocate the expenses of any such insurance policies based on the actual claims related to a particular client, including the Fund. The Fund and the Adviser do not intend to separately maintain key person life insurance on any key personnel.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Relating to Lack of Diversification. The Fund is classified as a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, which means that the Fund is not limited by the 1940 Act with respect to the proportion of its assets that it may invest in securities of a single issuer. To the extent that the Fund assumes large positions in the securities of a small number of issuers, its net asset value may fluctuate to a greater extent than that of a diversified investment company as a result of changes in the financial condition or the market’s assessment of the issuer. The Fund may also be more susceptible to any single economic or regulatory occurrence than a diversified investment company. Beyond the Fund’s asset diversification requirements as a RIC under the Code, the Fund does not have fixed guidelines for diversification, and its investments could be concentrated in relatively few portfolio companies. Although the Fund is classified as a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, it maintains the flexibility to operate as a diversified investment company. To the extent that the Fund operates as a non-diversified investment company, it may be subject to greater risk.

During the period of time in which the Fund is deploying its initial capital, the Fund may make a limited number of investments. In addition, the Fund does not have fixed guidelines for diversification by industry or type of security, and investments may be concentrated in only a few industries or types of securities. Further, if the expected amount of leverage is not obtained or deployed, the Fund may be more concentrated in an investment than originally anticipated. As a result, the Fund’s investments may be concentrated and the poor performance of a single investment may have pronounced negative consequences to the Fund and the aggregate returns realized by the Fund investors.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Relating to Distributions. The Fund intends to pay monthly distributions to shareholders out of assets legally available for distribution. The Fund cannot guarantee that it will achieve investment results that will allow it to make a specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. If the Fund is unable to satisfy the asset coverage test applicable to it as a BDC, or if the Fund violates certain debt financing agreements, its ability to pay distributions to shareholders could be limited. All distributions will be paid at the discretion of the Fund’s Board and will depend on the Fund’s earnings, financial condition, maintenance of RIC status, compliance with applicable BDC regulations, compliance with debt financing agreements and such other factors as the Board may deem relevant from time to time. The distributions the Fund pays to investors in a year may exceed the Fund’s taxable income for that year and, accordingly, a portion of such distributions may constitute a return of capital for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Investors who periodically receive the payment of a distribution from a RIC consisting of a return of capital for U.S. federal income tax purposes may be under the impression that they are receiving a distribution of RIC’s net ordinary income or capital gains when they are not. Accordingly, investors should read carefully any written disclosure accompanying a distribution from the Fund and the information about the specific tax characteristics of the Fund’s distributions provided to investors after the end of each calendar year, and should not assume that the source of any distribution is the Fund’s net ordinary income or capital gains. To the extent that the Fund’s distributions contain a return of capital, such distributions should not be considered the dividend yield or total return of an investment in the Common Shares. The amount treated as a tax-free return of capital will reduce a shareholder’s adjusted tax basis in the Common Shares, thereby increasing the shareholder’s potential taxable gain or reducing the potential taxable loss on the sale of Common Shares.

There are General Regulatory Risks Applicable to the Fund. Legal, tax and regulatory changes could occur that may adversely affect the Fund, the shareholders and/or the portfolio investments. Recent proposals by the SEC indicate increased focus on the regulatory environment for investment vehicles such as the Fund, for holders of securities thereof, for investment advisers thereto and for lenders thereto is evolving, and changes in the regulation of any thereof may adversely affect the value of Common Shares held by or returns to a shareholder and/or the ability of the Fund to pursue its investment strategy.

Although the Fund and the Adviser will endeavor to comply with the requirements of a law and any changes thereto, the treatment of such entities and their investment or investment advisory activities is often uncertain, and may frequently depend on determinations of fact and interpretations of complex provisions of law and regulation for which there may be no clear precedent or authority or with respect to which the law or regulations are in the process of being considered for revocation or modification. Under such circumstances, the Fund and/or the Adviser may employ standard or developing industry practice or conventions, as well as its own internal policies and procedures, to guide its compliance efforts. There can be no assurance, however, that such practices, conventions, policies and procedures ultimately will be considered compliant, and as a result, the Fund or the Adviser, despite its efforts, may be exposed to liability (which may be subject to indemnification by the Fund or the shareholders), possibly on a retroactive basis, as practice, conventions, policies or procedures change or are challenged or the procedures for compliance with the regulatory regimes to which such entities are subject become clearer. Moreover, the regulatory regimes to which the Fund, the Adviser and the shareholders are subject may be administered differently by different governmental authorities or may be administered differently by different personnel within a particular governmental authority or over time and are generally under review by the applicable government authorities in the various jurisdictions in which such entities have investment or other activities, sometimes resulting in revised interpretations of seemingly established concepts. The treatment of such entities or their activities may be modified by administrative, legislative or judicial interpretation at any time, and any such action may affect investments or commitments previously made. In addition, as a result of such changes, the structure and activities of such entities may be challenged. Accordingly, the Fund, the shareholders and/or the Adviser could be adversely affected by any of such changes in laws, regulations, interpretations or the administration thereof.

If the Fund incurs indebtedness directly or indirectly that constitutes the issuance of an asset-backed security or a securitization as defined under then applicable law in the United States of America, in Europe or in Japan, the Fund, the Adviser or an affiliate of any thereof, may be required to (or may elect to) hold credit risk retention interests with respect thereto for the period of time and subject to the restrictions and limitations applicable thereto under then applicable law which could reduce the returns available to the Fund and the shareholders and potentially cause other adverse consequences for the Fund.

The Fund’s portfolio companies and the Fund are subject to regulation by-laws at the U.S. federal, state, and local levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, may change from time to time, including as the result of interpretive guidance or other directives from the U.S. President and others in the executive branch, and new laws, regulations, and interpretations may also come into effect. Any such new or changed laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Fund’s business. The effects of such laws and regulations on the financial services industry will depend, in large part, upon the extent to which regulators exercise the authority granted to them and the approaches taken in implementing regulations.

Future legislative and regulatory proposals directed at the financial services industry that are proposed or pending in the U.S. Congress may negatively impact the operations, cash flows or financial condition of the Fund or its portfolio companies, impose additional costs on portfolio companies or the Fund intensify the regulatory supervision of the Fund or its portfolio companies or otherwise adversely affect the Fund’s business or the business of its portfolio companies. Laws that apply to the Fund, either now or in the future, are often highly complex and may include licensing requirements. The licensing process can be lengthy and can be expected to subject the Fund to increased regulatory oversight. Failure, even if unintentional, to comply fully with applicable laws may result in sanctions, fines, or limitations on the ability of the Fund or the Adviser to do business in the relevant jurisdiction or to procure required licenses in other jurisdictions, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Fund. In addition, if the Fund does not comply with applicable laws and regulations, it could lose any licenses that it then holds for the conduct of its business and may be subject to civil fines and criminal penalties.

Privacy and Data Protection. The Fund’s collection, use, maintenance, handling, transfer and other processing of personal data, including in relation to, amongst others, the staff and representatives, individuals considering and/or making an investment in the Fund, and individuals connected with investors (such as directors, trustees, beneficial owners, advisors and agents), imposes legal and regulatory risk. Legal and regulatory requirements relating to the collection, storage, usage, maintenance, handling, transfer and other processing of personal data continue to evolve and could impose costly compliance burdens on the Fund. The Fund is and could directly or indirectly become subject to existing and future federal, state and international laws, regulations, rules or requirements related to privacy, data protection and information security in the jurisdictions in which it does business and/or its investors are located.

For example, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) includes a range of compliance obligations regarding the handling of personal data and significant financial penalties for non-compliance (the greater of €20 million or 4% of annual global turnover). Following Brexit, the U.K. General Data Protection Regulation (i.e., a version of the GDPR as implemented into U.K. law) (“UK GDPR”) went into effect. While the GDPR and the UK GDPR remain substantially similar for the time being, the UK government has announced that it would seek to chart its own path on data protection and reform its relevant laws, including in ways that could differ from the GDPR.

The Fund could also be subject to existing and new U.S. federal, state and local privacy, data protection, and information security laws and regulations, such as the Federal Trade Commission Act, which regulates unfair or deceptive acts or practices (including with respect to privacy, data protection and information security); the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, which restricts certain collection, storage, use, disclosure and other processing of personal data, requires notice to individuals of privacy practices and provides individuals with certain rights to prevent the use and disclosure of certain non-public or otherwise legally protected data; the California Consumer Privacy Act, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act, which provides California residents with certain individual privacy rights and imposes privacy, data protection and information security obligations on covered companies, as well as state data breach notification and other laws, including the New York SHIELD ACT, that require enhanced levels of cybersecurity and notification to individuals and/or regulators in the event of a cybersecurity breach of certain personal data or other similar incidents. A number of other states also have enacted, or are considering enacting, comprehensive privacy, data protection and information security laws, and the United States Congress is also considering various proposals for privacy, data protection and information security legislation.

The Fund intends to comply with any obligations arising out of privacy, data protection, and information security laws and regulations that are applicable to it, but may not be able to accurately anticipate the way in which regulators and courts will apply or interpret such laws and regulations, including their applicability to the Fund. If any such laws or regulations are implemented, interpreted or applied in a manner inconsistent with the Fund’s policies and practices, it may be fined or ordered to change its business practices in a manner that increases compliance burdens and costs and adversely impacts its operating results. Compliance with these laws and regulations, including the obligation to timely notify stakeholders in the event of a cybersecurity incident, may divert the Fund’s time and effort and entail substantial expense. Any failure or perceived failure by the Fund to comply with existing and new privacy, data protection and information security laws and regulations could result in negative publicity and may subject the Fund to significant costs associated with litigation, settlements, regulatory action, judgments, fines, liabilities and other penalties, for which the Fund may not have insurance coverage.

The Fund Borrows Money, Which Magnifies the Potential for Gain or Loss on Amounts and May Increase the Risk of Investing With Us. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and, therefore, increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. We may enter into one or more credit facilities and may issue or assume other senior securities, and in the future may borrow from, or issue additional senior securities to, banks, insurance companies, funds, institutional investors and other lenders and investors. Lenders and holders of such senior securities have fixed dollar claims on the Fund’s consolidated assets that are superior to the claims of our shareholders. If the value of our consolidated assets increases, then leveraging would cause the net asset value per share of our Common Shares to increase more sharply than it would have had we not incurred leverage.

Conversely, if the value of our consolidated assets decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not incurred leverage. Similarly, any increase in our consolidated income in excess of consolidated interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net income to increase more than it would had we not incurred leverage, while any decrease in our consolidated income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not incurred leverage. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make distribution payments on our Common Shares. There can be no assurance that a leveraging strategy will be successful.

Any credit facilities into which the Fund may enter impose financial and operating covenants that may restrict the Fund’s business activities, including limitations that could hinder our ability to finance additional loans and investments or to make the distributions required to maintain our status as a RIC. A failure to renew any credit facilities or to add new or replacement debt facilities or to issue additional debt securities or other evidence of indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Terrorist Action, Military Action, Protests, Pandemics and Natural Disasters. There is a risk of terrorist attacks, military actions, other armed conflicts, violent protests, pandemics and/or natural disasters in the United States and elsewhere causing significant loss of life, property damage and/or disruptions in the local or global markets. These events can also lead to, or be a symptom of, economic, political and/or social instability. Economic and diplomatic sanctions may be in place or imposed on certain states or persons. The imposition of sanctions could adversely impact the value and/or liquidity of assets where an obligor is located in or economically tied to a sanctioned country or person. Additionally, sanctions can lead to devaluation of a sanctioned country’s currency and increased market volatility both in the sanctioned country and throughout the world, which could impact obligors and the Fund, even if there is no direct relationship with a sanctioned country or person.

Pandemics and natural disasters may have similarly disruptive impacts. The potential impact of such events is unclear, but such events could have a material adverse effect on general economic conditions, the ability of obligors of Portfolio Loans held by the Fund to repay such Portfolio Loans, lenders extending credit facilities to the Fund, or market liquidity, thereby adversely impacting the operations of the Adviser or the Fund and the returns to the shareholders.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Relating to Infectious Disease and Pandemics. Certain illnesses spread rapidly and have the potential to significantly adversely affect the global economy. Outbreaks such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome, avian influenza, H1N1/09, and, most recently, the coronavirus (COVID-19), or other similarly infectious diseases may have material adverse impacts on the Fund, the Adviser, their respective affiliates and portfolio companies. Actual pandemics, or fear of pandemics, can trigger market disruptions or economic turndowns with the consequences described above. The Adviser cannot predict the likelihood of disease outbreaks occurring in the future nor how such outbreaks may affect the Fund’s investments.

The outbreak of disease epidemics may result in the closure of the Adviser’s and/or a portfolio company’s offices or other businesses, including office buildings, retail stores and other commercial venues and could also result in (a) the lack of availability or price volatility of raw materials or component parts necessary to a portfolio company’s business which may adversely affect the ability of a portfolio company to perform its obligations, (b) disruption of regional or global trade markets and/or the availability of capital, (c) the availability of leverage, including an inability to obtain indebtedness at all or to the Fund’s desired degree, and less favorable timing of repayment and other terms with respect to such leverage, (d) trade or travel restrictions which impact a portfolio company’s business and/or (e) a general economic decline and have an adverse impact on the Fund’s value, the Fund’s investments, or the Fund’s ability to make new investments.

Changes in the Leveraged Finance and Fixed Income Markets May Affect Shareholders. In recent years, the leveraged finance and fixed income markets have at times contributed to a severe liquidity crisis in the global credit markets. There have also been at times substantial fluctuations in prices for leveraged loans and limited liquidity for such loans. No assurance can be made that the conditions giving rise to such price fluctuations and limited liquidity will not continue or become more acute in the future. During periods of limited liquidity and higher price volatility, the ability of the Fund to acquire or dispose of Portfolio Loans at a price and time that the Adviser deems advantageous may be severely impaired. As a result, in periods of rising market prices, the Fund may be unable to participate in price increases fully to the extent that it is unable to acquire desired positions quickly and its inability to dispose fully and promptly of positions in declining markets may cause its net asset value to decline and may exacerbate losses suffered thereby when Portfolio Loans are sold. Furthermore, significant additional liquidity-related risks may exist for the Fund and the shareholders including, among others, (i) the possibility that the prices at which Portfolio Loans can be sold by the Fund will have deteriorated from their effective purchase price, and (ii) the possibility that opportunities for the Fund to sell its assets in the secondary market may be impaired or restricted by a portfolio credit facility. These additional risks may result in losses, negatively affect the returns on the Common Shares or otherwise adversely affect shareholders.

Regardless of current or future market conditions, certain Portfolio Loans purchased by the Fund will have only a limited trading market (or none). The Fund’s investment in illiquid Portfolio Loans may restrict its ability to dispose of Portfolio Loans in a timely fashion and for a fair price, as well as their ability to take advantage of market opportunities. While liquidity in loans to middle market companies has increased in recent years, loans to middle market companies similar to the loans that the Fund intends to acquire are less liquid than broadly syndicated loans and certain of such middle market loans that may be acquired by the Fund are less liquid than more traditional senior secured loans to middle market companies. Illiquid Portfolio Loans may trade at a discount from comparable, more liquid loans or other investments. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Portfolio Loans—Non-Investment Grade Loans to Middle Market Companies Involve Particular Risks” for a further description of the illiquidity of non-investment grade loans to middle market companies.

In addition, adverse developments in the primary market for loans to middle market companies, unitranche loans and/or leveraged loans in general may reduce opportunities for the Fund to acquire loans that would qualify as Portfolio Loans. The ability of private equity sponsors and leveraged loan arrangers to effectuate new leveraged buy-outs and the ability of the Fund to acquire such loans may be partially or significantly limited depending on market and regulatory conditions. Furthermore, possible changes in the tax laws of the United States could result in private equity sponsors and obligors electing to reduce leveraged loans as part of their portfolio companies’ capital structure and to obtain more of their funding in the form of equity which may reduce the amount of Portfolio Loans available for acquisition by the Fund. The impact of any such changes affecting the leveraged loan market or another liquidity crisis on the global credit markets may adversely affect the management flexibility of the Adviser in relation to the portfolio and, ultimately, the returns on the Common Shares to shareholders.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Relating to Developments in the Leveraged Loan Market. The global economy has been affected for a number of years by the crisis in the credit markets initially caused by problems in the U.S. subprime residential mortgage loan market and, in the United States, a slow recovery thereafter. The global economy is still being negatively affected by, among other things, certain national deficits and sovereign debt levels incurred before or during the credit crisis. Among the sectors of the global credit markets that experienced particular difficulty during the credit crisis were the collateralized debt obligations and leveraged finance markets. There is no assurance that such markets may not experience similar difficulties in the future. There continues to exist significant risks for the Fund and shareholders as a result of uncertain or volatile economic conditions. These risks include, among others, (i) the likelihood that it may be more difficult to sell any of the Fund’s assets in the secondary market, thus rendering it more difficult to dispose of such assets, (ii) the possibility that the price at which the Fund’s assets can be sold by the Fund will have deteriorated from their effective purchase price, (iii) the illiquidity of the Common Shares, as there is currently little or no secondary trading in equity securities issued in connection with entities such as the Fund and none is expected to develop, and (iv) the possibility of a recession or other economic downturn affecting obligors. All of these risks may affect the returns on the Common Shares to shareholders and the ability of shareholders to realize their returns. The Fund’s assets will primarily consist of Portfolio Loans to middle market companies that may be particularly susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to make scheduled payments of interest or principal on their borrowings during these periods. See “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Portfolio Loans—Non-Investment Grade Loans to Middle Market Companies Involve Particular Risks.” The volume of leveraged loans that are available for acquisition by the Fund may vary from time to time. As a result, opportunities for the Fund to acquire such assets may be limited. This is also likely to heighten refinancing risk in respect of maturing loans. In addition, obligors on loans may be more likely to exercise any rights they may have to redeem or refinance such loans when interest rates or spreads are declining. These additional risks may affect the returns on the Common Shares to shareholders and could further slow, delay or reverse an economic recovery and cause a further deterioration in loan performance generally.

Future crises may have a negative impact on the economic conditions in the affected jurisdictions. Any slowdown in growth or commencement of a recession in such economies as a result thereof has had and in the future is expected to have an adverse effect on the ability of consumers and businesses to repay or refinance their existing debt. Adverse macroeconomic conditions may adversely affect the rating, performance and the realization value of the loans. It is possible that the loans will experience higher default rates than anticipated and that performance will suffer.

As a result of the credit crisis, some leading global financial institutions were forced into mergers with other financial institutions, have been partially or fully nationalized or became bankrupt or insolvent. The bankruptcy or insolvency of a major financial institution may have an adverse effect on the Funds, particularly if such financial institution is the administrative agent of one or more Portfolio Loans, a seller of a participation interest therein, or is the agent or lender under a credit facility financing to the Fund. In addition, the bankruptcy, insolvency or financial distress of one or more additional financial institutions, or one or more sovereigns, may trigger additional crises in the global credit markets and overall economy which could have a significant adverse effect on Fund assets and the Common Shares.

Although the leveraged finance and CLO markets have made significant recoveries from the adverse impact of the recent credit crisis, there can be no assurance that the leveraged finance and CLO markets will not be adversely impacted by future economic downturns or market volatility.

It is Anticipated that All or Most of the Portfolio Loans will be Sourced by Adviser Parties. Except to the extent otherwise permitted by the Fund’s investment criteria, since it is anticipated that all or most of the Portfolio Loans will be sourced through the Antares Lending Platform, the Fund will be relying on the performance of the loan origination business of the Antares Lending Platform and the relevant Adviser Parties in general for both the types of Portfolio Loans and the quality of such Portfolio Loans, and for other related services including, without limitation, access to market deal flow, credit diligence and portfolio administration, accounting, tax, human resources, information technology and legal/compliance support. Therefore, a decline in the business and other business activity of the Antares Lending Platform could have adverse consequences for the Fund and the shareholders. There can be no assurance that the Antares Lending Platform will source loans of equal or better quality than those sourced by it in the past. If the Antares Lending Platform suffers from a decline in business, or loosens its credit standards, the loans sourced thereby may suffer in credit quality. In order to maintain levels of business activity and/or profitability, the Antares Lending Platform may make concessions to obligors on loans. In addition, there is no assurance that the Antares Lending Platform will continue to source loans that fit the Fund’s investment strategy or originate them in the same volume. Under such circumstances the size or performance of the Fund’s portfolio could be expected to be adversely affected.

Significant conflicts of interest will arise from the Fund acquiring all or most of the Portfolio Loans in this manner. See “Conflicts of Interest.”

Ratings and/or Credit Estimates are Not a Guarantee of Quality. Credit ratings and/or credit estimates of assets represent the rating agencies’ opinions regarding their credit quality and are not a guarantee of quality or performance. A credit rating or a credit estimate is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold assets and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency. If a credit rating or credit estimate assigned to any Portfolio Loan is lowered for any reason, no party is obligated to provide any additional support or credit enhancement with respect to such Portfolio Loan. Rating agencies attempt to evaluate the relative future creditworthiness of an obligation and do not address other risks, including, but not limited to, the likelihood of principal prepayments (both voluntary and involuntary), liquidity risk, market value or price volatility; therefore, credit ratings or credit estimates do not fully reflect the true risks of an investment in the related asset. Also, rating agencies may fail to make timely changes in credit ratings in response to subsequent events, so that an obligor’s current financial condition may be better or worse than a rating indicates. Further, rating agencies may change credit rating or credit estimate methodologies. Consequently, credit ratings or credit estimates of any Portfolio Loan should be used only as a preliminary indicator of perceived investment quality and should not be considered a reliable indicator of actual investment quality. Credit ratings or credit estimates of Portfolio Loans included in the Fund’s direct or indirect portfolio or of other loans similar to the Portfolio Loans may be subject to significant or severe adjustments downward. Credit rating or credit estimate reductions or withdrawals may occur for any number of reasons and may affect numerous assets at a single time or within a short period of time, which may have material adverse effects upon the Fund’s investments in Portfolio Loans.

Loans to middle market companies generally will not have a public rating, although some loans may have private ratings and/or credit estimates assigned by, or obtained pursuant to the methodology of, a nationally recognized statistical rating agency. A credit estimate is not identical to a credit rating, and may be assigned using a more limited analysis, based on public information or information supplied by the party requesting the credit estimate. Disclosure of private ratings and/or credit estimates, if any are available, is restricted and any such ratings or estimates are not expected to be disclosed to the Fund.

The Fund is Currently Operating in a Period of Capital Markets Disruption, Significant Volatility and Economic Uncertainty. The global capital markets are experiencing a period of disruption and instability resulting in increasing spreads between the yields realized on riskier debt securities and those realized on risk-free securities, lack of liquidity in parts of the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector and the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated market. Such market conditions may materially and adversely affect debt and equity capital markets, which may have a negative impact on our business and operations. Highly disruptive market conditions have resulted in increasing volatility and illiquidity in the global credit, debt and equity markets generally. The duration and ultimate effect of such market conditions cannot be accurately forecasted. Extreme uncertainty regarding economic markets is resulting in declines in the market values of potential investments and declines in the market values of investments after they are made or acquired by the Fund and affecting the potential for liquidity events involving such investments or portfolio companies. During periods of market disruption, portfolio companies may be more likely to seek to draw on unfunded commitments the Fund has made, and the risk of being unable to fund such commitments is heightened during such periods. Applicable accounting standards require the Fund to determine the fair value of its investments as the amount that would be received in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. While most of the Fund’s investments are not publicly traded, as part of the Fund’s valuation process the Fund considers a number of measures, including comparison to publicly traded securities. As a result, volatility in the public capital markets can adversely affect the Fund’s investment valuations.

Various social and political tensions around the world may contribute to increased market volatility, may have long-term effects on the worldwide financial markets and may cause further economic uncertainties worldwide. In particular, the consequences of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the conflict in the Middle East, including international sanctions, the potential impact on inflation and increased disruption to supply chains and a potential global recession may impact portfolio companies. Because Russia is a major exporter of oil and natural gas, the invasion and related sanctions have reduced the supply, and increased the price, of energy, which is accelerating inflation and may exacerbate ongoing supply chain issues. There is also the risk of retaliatory actions by Russia against countries which have enacted sanctions, including cyberattacks against financial and governmental institutions, which could result in business disruptions and further economic turbulence. Such consequences also may increase the Fund’s funding cost or limit its access to the capital markets.

A prolonged period of market illiquidity may cause the Fund to reduce the volume of loans and debt securities originated and/or fund and adversely affect the value of the Fund’s portfolio investments, which could have a material and adverse effect on the Fund’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Non-Investment Grade Loans to Middle Market Companies Involve Particular Risks. The Portfolio Loans will consist primarily of non-investment grade loans to middle market companies or participation interests therein, which are subject to liquidity, market value, credit, repricing, default, recovery, interest rate, reinvestment and other risks. The Portfolio Loans are generally considered to be subject to greater risks than investment grade corporate obligations and will be less liquid than both investment grade corporate obligations and broadly syndicated loans. These risks could be exacerbated to the extent that the portfolio is concentrated in one or more particular types of Portfolio Loans. There can be no assurance that the Adviser will correctly evaluate the nature and magnitude of the various factors that could affect the value and returns of the Portfolio Loans or will be able to acquire on behalf of the Portfolio Loans that will generate sufficient returns to meet the Fund’s or the shareholders’ expectations.

Prices of the Portfolio Loans may be volatile, and will generally fluctuate due to a variety of factors that are inherently difficult to predict, including but not limited to changes in interest rates, prevailing credit spreads, general economic conditions, financial market conditions, domestic and international economic or political events, developments or trends in any particular industry, and the financial condition of the obligors of the Portfolio Loans. In particular, the market for non-investment grade loans has experienced periods of volatility in the supply and demand for such loans, resulting in fluctuations and changes in, among other things, spreads, interest rate floors, purchase discounts, leverage, covenants, structure, and other terms. Additionally, loans and participation interests in loans generally have significant liquidity and market value risks because they are not generally traded in organized exchange markets but are traded by banks and other institutional investors in privately negotiated transactions. Because loans are privately syndicated and loan agreements are privately negotiated and customized, loans are not purchased or sold as easily as publicly traded securities. In addition, historically the trading volume in the loan market, especially in the middle market, has been small relative to both the high-yield debt securities market and the broadly syndicated loan market. As a result, the Portfolio Loans will be subject to greater risks than broadly syndicated loans issued by larger companies.

All or a significant majority of the Portfolio Loans are expected to consist of loans to middle market companies. Although middle market loans share many of the same characteristics as more broadly syndicated loans, including a senior secured position in the obligor’s capital structure and floating rate interest payments, loans to middle market companies tend to be less widely held and are not often publicly rated. Loans to middle market companies may have default rates or recovery rates that differ (and may be better or worse) than has been the case for broadly syndicated loans or investment grade corporate obligations. As a result, the Portfolio Loans will be subject to greater risks than broadly syndicated loans entered into by larger companies.

Because a more limited number of investors invest in loans to middle market companies, the trading volume for such loans is relatively illiquid as compared to that of broadly syndicated loans. In addition, investors who invest in middle market loans typically invest in unitranche loans in middle market companies, the trading volume of which is likely to be relatively illiquid as compared to that of more traditional senior secured loans to middle market companies. In addition, the trading market for Portfolio Loans that are revolving loans is substantially less liquid than that for term loans since certain loan market investors are not permitted to, or prefer not to, invest in revolving loans. Furthermore, there are typically restrictions on transfers of Portfolio Loans under the related loan facility documents and, if the Portfolio Loan is a participation interest, there may be additional restrictions on transfer under the related participation agreement. The illiquidity of the Portfolio Loans may restrict the ability of the Fund (or the Adviser on its behalf) to dispose of such Portfolio Loans in a timely fashion and for a fair price as well as its ability to take advantage of market opportunities.

A non-investment grade middle market loan or participation interest therein is generally considered speculative in nature and may experience defaults for a variety of reasons. A middle market loan may become subject to either substantial workout negotiations or a restructuring, which may entail, among other things, a substantial reduction in the interest rate, a substantial write-down of principal, deferral of payment, payments-in-kind of interest, and a substantial change in the terms, conditions and covenants with respect to such loan. In addition, such negotiations or restructuring may be quite extensive, protracted and costly over time, and therefore may result in substantial uncertainty with respect to the ultimate recovery on such loan. The liquidity of a loan in default will be limited, and to the extent that a defaulted loan is sold, it is highly unlikely that the proceeds from such sale will be equal to the amount of unpaid principal and interest thereon. There can be no assurance as to the levels of defaults and/or recoveries that may be experienced on the Portfolio Loans and an increase in default levels or a decrease in recoveries would be expected to adversely affect the returns of the Fund in respect of the Portfolio Loans.

Loan Prepayments May Affect the Ability of the Adviser to Invest Available Funds in Appropriate Portfolio Loans. Loans are generally prepayable in whole or in part at any time at the option of the obligor thereof at par plus accrued unpaid interest thereon. Prepayments on loans may be caused by a variety of factors which are often difficult to predict. Consequently, there exists a risk that Portfolio Loans purchased at a price greater than par may experience a capital loss as a result of such a prepayment. In addition, certain Portfolio Loans may include excess cash flow capture and other mandatory prepayment provisions, which may accelerate the amortization of the applicable Portfolio Loan. Any inability of the Adviser (if it is permitted to reinvest such funds on behalf of the Fund) to reinvest payments or other proceeds in Portfolio Loans with comparable interest rates may adversely affect the returns of the Fund in respect of the Portfolio Loans. There is no assurance that the Adviser will be able to reinvest proceeds in Portfolio Loans with comparable interest rates or as to the length of any delays before such investments are made.

The rate of prepayments, amortization and defaults may be influenced by various factors including, among other things: (i) changes in obligor performance and requirements for capital; (ii) the level of interest rates and the shape of the yield curve; (iii) lack of credit being extended and/or the tightening of credit underwriting standards in the commercial lending industry and supply and demand economics in capital markets; and (iv) the overall economic environment.

The Adviser cannot predict the actual rate of prepayments, accelerated amortization or defaults which will be experienced with respect to the Portfolio Loans.

Lender Liability Considerations and Equitable Subordination can Affect the Fund’s Rights with Respect to Portfolio Loans. A number of judicial decisions in the United States have upheld judgments of obligors against lending institutions on the basis of various evolving legal theories (collectively termed “lender liability”). Generally, lender liability is founded upon the premise that an institutional lender has violated a duty (whether implied or contractual) of good faith, commercial reasonableness and fair dealing owed to the obligor or has assumed an excessive degree of control over the obligor resulting in the creation of a fiduciary duty owed to the obligor or its other creditors or shareholders. Because of the nature of the portfolio of Portfolio Loans, the Fund could become directly or indirectly subject to allegations of lender liability individually or as part of a group of lenders and could also be liable for pro rata liabilities of the agent or lead lender.

In addition, under common law principles that in some cases form the basis for lender liability claims, if a holder of debt (i) intentionally takes an action that results in the undercapitalization of an obligor to the detriment of other creditors of such obligor, (ii) engages in other inequitable conduct to the detriment of such other credits, (iii) engages in fraud with respect to, or makes misrepresentations to, such other creditors, or (iv) uses its influence as a stockholder to dominate or control an obligor to the detriment of other creditors of such obligor, a court can elect to subordinate the claim of the offending holder of debt to the claims of the disadvantaged creditor or creditors, a remedy called “equitable subordination.” Because of the nature of the portfolio of Portfolio Loans held by the Fund, the portfolio of Portfolio Loans could be subject to claims of equitable subordination.

Moreover, because the Fund and affiliates of, or persons related to, the Adviser and its affiliates could hold an equity investment or other interests in portfolio companies to which the Fund has made a Portfolio Loan, generally will act as the loan agent with respect to the related loan facility, could be registered title owner and seller of a participation interest in such loan investment and/or generally will hold related loans and/or equity investments, the Fund could be exposed to claims for equitable subordination or lender liability or both based on such equity investment or other holdings or activities of the Adviser and its affiliates.

The preceding discussion is based upon principles of United States federal and state laws. As to Portfolio Loans that are obligations of non-United States obligors, the laws of certain foreign jurisdictions could impose liability upon lenders under factual circumstances similar to those described above, with consequences that could, but will not necessarily be, analogous to those described above.

The Fund will Have Limited Consent and Control Rights with Respect to the Loan Facilities of Which the Portfolio Loans Are a Part. As a lender in a loan facility that has multiple lenders, the Fund will have limited consent and control rights, and such rights may not be effective in view of the expected proportion of such obligations held thereby as compared to the other lenders. In all instances, the Fund will own less than a majority of the related loan(s) of which the Portfolio Loans are a part and will not control decision making by the required lenders under the related credit facility documents except to the extent that such documents require the consent of all lenders. If the consent of all lenders is required to a modification, most credit facility documents provide that the loan of any lender failing to so consent may be redeemed by the obligor or purchased by an existing or new lender, in either such case at par together with accrued interest. If the Fund is a non-consenting lender, the related Portfolio Loan may be sold under such circumstances and there can be no assurance that the Adviser will be permitted or able to redeploy any sale or redemption proceeds received in connection therewith in Portfolio Loans having the same or a better yield or average life as any such Portfolio Loan so prepaid or sold, or at all, which may adversely affect the Fund’s expected return. To the extent that the Antares Lending Platform, any joint venture in which the Antares Lending Platform participates or any other person owns portions of such loans or Antares Lending Platform is interested in maintaining a performing loan as part of the Antares Direct Holdings and good business relations with the related obligor and its sponsor (as opposed to having a competitor in the loan market provide the desire loan to the obligor), they may act in their own interests in connection therewith without considering the interests of the Fund. See “Risk Factors – Risks Relating to Portfolio Loans – The Fund is Subject to Risks Related to Repricing” and “Conflicts of Interest.”

Except as otherwise expressly provided herein and in any portfolio credit facility, as applicable, the Adviser will direct the exercise and enforcement, or direct the Fund to refrain from exercising and enforcing, any or all of its rights and remedies in connection with the Portfolio Loans or any related loan documents and will direct consents or rejections of amendments or waivers of the terms of any Portfolio Loan and related loan documents and any workouts or restructuring in accordance with the Adviser’s investment management practices and the Fund will not otherwise have any right to compel the Adviser to take or refrain from taking any actions. The Adviser will be subject to certain conflicts of interest, as described in “Conflicts of Interest” below.

Agency Provisions with Respect to the Portfolio Loans Could Impair Enforcement Actions Against the Collateral Securing the Portfolio Loans and Expose the Fund to Losses on the Portfolio Loans; The Fund Might Not Have the Ability to Control Decisions with Respect to Portfolio Loans. The Portfolio Loans are expected to consist primarily of agented loans. Under the loan documents with respect to agented loans, a financial institution or other entity may be designated as the administrative agent, loan agent and/or collateral agent or a person acting in a similar capacity. Under these arrangements, the obligor typically grants a lien to the collateral agent on behalf of the lenders and the obligor makes payments to the administrative agents, which distributes obligor payments to the related lenders including the Fund. Such administrative agent may also collect advances made by the lenders and pays them over to the obligor in connection with the closing of the related Portfolio Loan and thereafter with respect to advances on revolving loans and delayed draw loans. Such administrative agents typically receive such payments into and distribute them from a commingled account. Certain decisions with respect to the related Portfolio Loan may be made by the administrative agent on behalf of the lenders under the related loan documents. An Adviser Party is expected to be the administrative agent with respect to most or all of the Portfolio Loans, subject to the terms of the related loan documents, which gives rise to certain conflicts of interest.

Risks related to agented loans include the possibility that a loan agent may become bankrupt or insolvent. Such an event would delay, and possibly impair, any enforcement actions undertaken by the related lenders such as the Fund, including attempts to realize upon the collateral securing the Portfolio Loan and/or directing the applicable agent to take actions against the related obligor or the collateral securing a Portfolio Loan and taking actions to realize on proceeds or payments made by obligor that are in the possession or control of such agent. In addition, agented Portfolio Loans typically allow for agents to resign with certain advance notice. Such Portfolio Loans may not, however, contain provisions for the lenders to remove agents thereunder. Therefore, under circumstances where removal of an agent would be in the best interests of the lenders (including the Fund), the applicable loan documents would have to be amended by the lenders holding the requisite amount of the associated indebtedness with the agreement of one or more agents (which may not be forthcoming) to remove an agent thereunder. Further, if an agented loan is a revolving loan or a delayed draw loan, there is the possibility of other lenders failing to satisfy their funding commitment, which could result in a dispute. Any such actions could expose the Fund to losses with respect to the related Portfolio Loan.

Investing in Senior Secured Loans Subordinated in Right of Payment Involves Certain Risks. The Fund may invest in second lien loans, each of which will be secured by a pledge of collateral, but which is subordinated (with respect to liquidation preferences with respect to pledged collateral) to other secured obligations of the obligors secured by all or a portion of the collateral securing such second lien loan. Second lien loans are typically subject to intercreditor arrangements, the provisions of which can prohibit or restrict the ability of the holder of a second lien loan to (i) exercise remedies against the collateral with respect to their second liens; (ii) challenge any exercise of remedies against the collateral by the first lien lenders with respect to their first liens; (iii) challenge the enforceability or priority of the first liens on the collateral; and (iv) exercise certain other secured creditor rights, both before and during a bankruptcy of the obligor. In addition, during a bankruptcy of the obligor, the holder of a second lien loan might not be required to give advance consent to (a) any use of cash collateral approved by the first lien creditors; (b) sales of collateral approved by the first lien lenders and the bankruptcy court, so long as the second liens continue to attach to the sale proceeds; and (c) debtor-in-possession financings.

A portion of the Portfolio Loans may consist of first-lien last-out loans (including, without limitation, the “last out” portion of unitranche loans). A first-lien last-out loan is a loan that may be fully subordinated in right of payment or application of proceeds (other than permitted interest and principal payments) to the related senior secured loans of the same obligor until related senior secured loans are paid in full.

A portion of the Portfolio Loans may consist of senior secured loans that have a first lien on the related obligor’s assets and where the related obligor has a super-priority revolving or term loan facility that will, in a default scenario, be paid prior to such Portfolio Loan. For such Portfolio Loans, if the super-priority revolving or term loan facility provides significant leverage to the obligor, then the risks relating to the Fund’s lien on the obligor’s assets may be similar to the risks relating to second lien loans. In such cases, the creditors holding the super-priority revolving or term loan facility will have a senior priority over Portfolio Loans with respect to the related obligor’s assets. To the extent that the Antares Lending Platform, any joint venture in which the Antares Lending Platform participates or any other person owns portions of such super-priority loans, they may act in their own interests in connection therewith without considering the interests of the Fund.

Insolvency Considerations with Respect to Obligors of Portfolio Loans May Affect the Fund’s Rights. Various laws enacted for the protection of creditors may apply to the Portfolio Loans. If a court in a lawsuit brought by an unpaid creditor or representative of creditors of an obligor of a Portfolio Loan, such as a trustee in bankruptcy, were to find that the obligor did not receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value for incurring the indebtedness constituting such Portfolio Loan and, after giving effect to such indebtedness, the obligor (i) was insolvent, (ii) was engaged in a business for which the remaining assets of such obligor constituted unreasonably small capital or (iii) intended to incur, or believed that it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they mature, such court could determine to invalidate, in whole or in part, such indebtedness as a fraudulent conveyance, to subordinate such indebtedness to existing or future creditors of the obligor or to recover amounts previously paid by the obligor in satisfaction of such indebtedness. The measure of insolvency for purposes of the foregoing will vary. Generally, an obligor would be considered insolvent at a particular time if the sum of its debts were then greater than all of its property at a fair valuation or if the present fair saleable value of its assets were then less than the amount that would be required to pay its probable liabilities on its existing debts as they became absolute and matured. There can be no assurance as to what standard a court would apply in order to determine whether the obligor was “insolvent” after giving effect to the incurrence of the indebtedness constituting the related Portfolio Loan or that, regardless of the method of valuation, a court would not determine that the obligor was “insolvent” upon giving effect to such incurrence. In addition, in the event of the insolvency of an obligor of a Portfolio Loan, payments made on such Portfolio Loan could be subject to avoidance as a “preference” if made within a certain period of time (which may be as long as one year under federal bankruptcy law or even longer under state laws) before insolvency.

In general, if payments on Portfolio Loans are avoidable, whether as fraudulent conveyances or preferences, such payments can be recaptured, either from the initial recipient or from subsequent transferees of such payments. To the extent that any such payments are recaptured from the Fund or any Financing Subsidiary, the returns of the Fund in respect of the Portfolio Loans will be reduced thereby. However, it is likely that avoidable payments could not be recaptured directly from a lender that has given value in exchange for the Portfolio Loan, in good faith and without knowledge that the payments were avoidable. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that the Fund or any Financing Subsidiary will be able to avoid recapture on this or any other basis.

Certain of the Portfolio Loans May be Cross-Collateralized with Other Tranches of Indebtedness Incurred by the Same Obligor and May be Cross-Collateralized with Indebtedness Issued by More Than One Obligor. Cross-collateralization arrangements involving more than one obligor could be challenged as fraudulent conveyances by creditors of the related obligor in an action brought outside a bankruptcy case or, if the obligor were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case, by the obligor’s representative (or the obligor as debtor-in-possession), U.S. trustee or creditors’ committee.

Among other things, a legal challenge to the granting of the liens may focus on the benefits realized by the related obligor from the applicable Portfolio Loan proceeds, as well as the overall cross-collateralization. If a court were to conclude that the granting of the liens to cross-collateralize a Portfolio Loan was a voidable fraudulent conveyance, such court could subordinate all or part of the pertinent Portfolio Loan to existing or future indebtedness of that obligor, recover payments made under that Portfolio Loan, or take other actions detrimental to the Fund, including, under certain circumstances, invalidating the Portfolio Loan or the Fund’s interest in the collateral securing the cross-collateralized Portfolio Loan.

Furthermore, as a general matter, financial restructurings have increasing complexity because lenders in the banking and capital markets use sophisticated financing techniques to fund lending operations, including loan participations, investment funds, loan funding arrangements and other financing techniques. In the contracts documenting such arrangement, lenders often delegate some or all of their voting rights to other persons providing the funding, which may in turn further delegate such rights and consequently result in further delays to in-court and out-of-court restructurings and exacerbate the risks associated with insolvencies and restructuring.

Rising Interest Rates May Render Some Obligors Unable to Pay Interest on their Portfolio Loans and Changes in the Interest Rate on a Portfolio Loan May Impact the Fund. The Portfolio Loans will bear interest at floating interest rates. To the extent interest rates increase, periodic interest obligations owed by the related obligors will also increase. As prevailing interest rates increase, some obligors may not be able to make the increased interest payments on Portfolio Loans or refinance their balloon Portfolio Loans, resulting in payment defaults. Any payment default of an obligor under a Portfolio Loan will also have an adverse effect on its value and/or rating for purposes of various tests and triggers under a related portfolio credit facility which could have a material adverse effect on the Fund and could results in losses and/or reduced returns to the Fund and the shareholders. Conversely, if interest rates decline, obligors may refinance their Portfolio Loans at lower interest rates which could shorten the average life thereof and reduce the Fund’s expected returns with respect thereto, particularly if the Fund is not then able to directly or indirectly invest in other Portfolio Loans with an equal or greater interest rate and average life. Any bankruptcy or insolvency of an obligor under a Portfolio Loan will also have an adverse effect on its value and/or rating for purposes of various tests and triggers under a related portfolio credit facility which could have a material adverse effect on the Fund and could result in losses and/or reduced returns to the Fund and the shareholders.

In addition, Portfolio Loans may feature interest rates which will vary based on certain financial ratios of the related obligor. The interest rates payable by the obligors under such Portfolio Loans will typically be reduced if the applicable financial ratios of the related obligors improve and, accordingly, an improvement in the financial performance of obligors under these Portfolio Loans would result in a decrease in interest payments thereunder to the Fund. Conversely, the interest rates payable by the obligors under such Portfolio Loans will typically be increased if the applicable financial ratios of the related obligors deteriorate. However, while a deterioration in the financial performance of obligors under these Portfolio Loans would result in an increase in interest payments received by the Fund, increased payment obligations of such obligors could weaken the financial condition of such obligors in the future.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Associated with Investing in Equity. In connection with sourcing of Portfolio Loans, the Fund is permitted to invest in equity securities or options or rights to acquire equity securities of a portfolio company. Investment in equity securities could also arise in connection with the Fund’s debt investment opportunities and may be accompanied by “equity-kickers” or warrants. The Fund could also be forced to accept equity in certain circumstances or could choose to make equity investments in distressed companies, including in connection with restructuring investments in existing portfolio companies. Equity securities generally fluctuate in price more than bonds and can decline in value over short or extended periods. The value of equity securities generally will vary due to, among other factors, changes in a company’s financial condition and in overall market and economic conditions. Investments in equity securities of small or medium-sized market capitalization companies typically have more limited marketability and greater price volatility than the investments in the equity securities of larger companies. In addition, investments in equity can give rise to additional taxes and/or tax risks and the Fund could hold these investments through entities treated as corporations for U.S. federal tax purposes or other taxable structures which can reduce the return from such investments.

If the Fund invests in equity instruments of issuers whose performance diverges from the Adviser’s expectations, or if equity markets generally move in a single direction and the Fund has not hedged against such a general move, losses could result. The Fund also could be exposed to risks that issuers will not fulfill contractual obligations such as, in the case of private placements, registering restricted securities for public resale. In addition, an investment in equity securities could be subject to restrictions and contingencies regarding the terms of an investment. As with other investments that the Fund can make, the value of equity securities held by the Fund could be adversely affected by actual or perceived negative events relating to such securities, the industry, or geographic areas in which a portfolio company operates or the financial markets generally. However, equity securities typically are even more susceptible to such events given their subordinate position in the portfolio company’s capital structure. As such, equity securities generally have greater price volatility than fixed income securities or debt instruments. Equity investments in distressed portfolio companies can also be more likely to experience losses. While diversification among portfolio companies can help to mitigate some of these risks, the Fund is not required to diversify its investments in equity securities and investors should expect fluctuations in the value of equity securities held by the Fund based on market conditions.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Associated with Investing in Convertible Securities and Warrants. The value of convertible securities and warrants will vary with the movements in the equity market and the performance of the underlying common stock, in particular. The value of such warrants, direct equity investments, and equities received upon conversion of debt instruments is dependent primarily on the success of the applicable portfolio company’s business strategy and the growth of its earnings, but also depends on general economic and equity market conditions. Their value is also affected by adverse portfolio company or market information. With respect to warrants, their value could decrease or be zero (and thus not be exercised) if the market price of the underlying securities remains lower than the specified price at which holders of warrants are entitled to buy such securities, resulting in a loss to the Fund of the purchase price of the warrant (or the embedded warrant price in the case of securities issued with warrants attached). With respect to convertible securities, as with all fixed income securities, the market value of such securities tends to decline as interest rates increase and, conversely, to increase as interest rates decline. However, when the market price of the common stock underlying a convertible security exceeds the conversion price, the convertible security tends to reflect the market price of the underlying common stock. As the market price of the underlying common stock declines, the convertible security tends to trade increasingly on a yield basis and thus, might not decline in price to the same extent as the underlying common stock. Convertible securities rank senior to common stock in an issuer’s capital structure and consequently entail less risk than the issuer’s common stock. In evaluating a convertible security, the investment teams will give primary emphasis to the attractiveness of the underlying common stock. If a convertible security held by the Fund is called for redemption, the Fund will be required to permit the portfolio company to redeem the security, convert it into the underlying stock or sell it to a third party. Any of these actions could have an adverse effect on the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objectives.

The warrants, equity securities for which the warrants can be exercised, direct equity investments, and equities received upon conversion of debt instruments generally will be restricted securities that cannot readily be sold for some period of time and could be dependent on SEC registration requirements and marketing efforts required for public offerings that are outside the control of the Adviser. If the value of the equity securities underlying a warrant does not increase above the exercise price during the life of the warrant, the Adviser would permit the warrant to expire unexercised and the warrant would then have no value. Any of these actions could have an adverse effect on the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objectives.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Arising from Entering into a TRS Agreement. A total return swap (“TRS”) is a contract in which one party agrees to make periodic payments to another party based on the change in the market value of the assets underlying the TRS, which may include a specified security, basket of securities or securities indices during a specified period, in return for periodic payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate. A TRS effectively adds leverage to a portfolio by providing investment exposure to a security or market without owning or taking physical custody of such security or investing directly in such market. Because of the unique structure of a TRS, a TRS often offers lower financing costs than are offered through more traditional borrowing arrangements. For purposes of computing the Fund’s incentive fee on income and the incentive fee on capital gains, the calculation methodology will look through derivative financial instruments or swaps as if we owned the reference assets directly.

A TRS is subject to market risk, liquidity risk and risk of imperfect correlation between the value of the TRS and the loans underlying the TRS. In addition, we may incur certain costs in connection with the TRS that could in the aggregate be significant. A TRS is also subject to the risk that a counterparty will default on its payment obligations thereunder or that we will not be able to meet our obligations to the counterparty.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Relating to Securities Lending Agreements. We may from time to time make secured loans of our marginable securities to brokers, dealers and other financial institutions if our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, would at least equal 150% (equivalent to $2 of debt outstanding for each $1 of equity) immediately after each such loan. The risks in lending portfolio securities, as with other extensions of credit, consist of possible delay in recovery of the securities or possible loss of rights in the collateral should the borrower fail financially. However, such loans will be made only to brokers and other financial institutions that are believed by the Adviser to be of high credit standing. Securities loans are made to broker-dealers pursuant to agreements requiring that loans be continuously secured by collateral consisting of U.S. government securities, cash or cash equivalents (e.g., negotiable certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances or letters of credit) maintained on a daily mark-to-market basis in an amount at least equal at all times to the market value of the securities lent. If the Fund enters into a securities lending arrangement, the Adviser, as part of its responsibilities under the Advisory Agreement, will invest the Fund’s cash collateral in accordance with the Fund’s investment objective and strategies. The Fund will pay the borrower of the securities a fee based on the amount of the cash collateral posted in connection with the securities lending program. The borrower will pay to the Fund, as the lender, an amount equal to any dividends or interest received on the securities lent.

The Fund may invest the cash collateral received only in accordance with its investment objective, subject to the Fund’s agreement with the borrower of the securities. In the case of cash collateral, the Fund expects to pay a rebate to the borrower. The reinvestment of cash collateral will result in a form of effective leverage for the Fund.

Although voting rights or rights to consent with respect to the loaned securities pass to the borrower, the Fund, as the lender, will retain the right to call the loans and obtain the return of the securities loaned at any time on reasonable notice, and it will do so in order that the securities may be voted by the Fund if the holders of such securities are asked to vote upon or consent to matters materially affecting the investment. The Fund may also call such loans in order to sell the securities involved. When engaged in securities lending, the Fund’s performance will continue to reflect changes in the value of the securities loaned and will also reflect the receipt of interest through investment of cash collateral by the Fund in permissible investments.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Relating to Volatility in the Banking Sector. Recent bank failures, or near failures, and declines in the share prices other U.S. and non-U.S. banks have resulted in certain banks being placed on “watch lists,” suffering ratings downgrades and/or receiving emergency funding from governments. The impact of the banking sector’s volatility on the financial system and broader economy could be significant. Continued volatility in the banking sector could cause or intensify an economic recession, make it more difficult for the Fund and/or borrowers to obtain or refinance indebtedness at all or on as favorable terms as could otherwise have been obtained, and/or have other material adverse effects on the Fund and/or borrowers.

For certain borrowers, a large percentage of their assets are or could be held by a limited number of banks (or even a single bank). Failure of one or more banks used by a borrower could have a material adverse effect on such borrower. Cash, securities or other assets held in deposit accounts or securities accounts at a failed institution could be temporarily inaccessible or permanently lost. In these cases, the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) would guarantee balances up to $250,000 per bank but the accountholder would ordinarily be an unsecured creditor with respect to cash balances in excess of $250,000 held at a single bank, and therefore might not ultimately recover any value in excess such amounts.

If a bank that provides a credit facility and/or other services to the Fund or any of its borrowers fails, the Fund or borrower could be unable to draw funds under such credit facilities and might not be able to obtain replacement credit facilities or applicable other services from other lending institutions on a timely basis or on similar terms. If the Fund’s or any of its borrower’s credit facilities and accounts are provided by the same banking institution, and such banking institution fails, or one or more banks used by investors in the Fund or borrower were to fail, the Fund or borrower could be unable to, or limited in its ability to, draw capital which could create significant difficulties in funding any near-term obligations it has in respect of its investments or otherwise. If the banks with which the Fund’s borrowers have depositor or borrowing arrangements were to fail, there would be similar material adverse effects on such borrowers and the Fund. In most cases, the Adviser has no meaningful role in selecting the banks used by borrowers, and must rely on the borrower to select banking services with care. If one or more banks with whom the Fund or any of its borrowers maintains an account were to fail, the receipt and disbursement of funds by and from such account could be delayed or prevented, which could result in a default or other loss, and any deposits above the FDIC threshold could be lost.

The Fund Must Invest a Sufficient Portion of Assets in Qualifying Assets. The Fund may not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of the Fund’s total assets are qualifying assets.

The Fund believes that most of the investments that it may acquire in the future will constitute qualifying assets. However, the Fund may be precluded from investing in what it believes to be attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 1940 Act. If the Fund does not invest a sufficient portion of its assets in qualifying assets, it could violate the 1940 Act provisions applicable to BDCs. As a result of such violation, specific rules under the 1940 Act could prevent the Fund, for example, from making follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies (which could result in the dilution of its position) or could require the Fund to dispose of investments at inappropriate times in order to come into compliance with the 1940 Act. If the Fund needs to dispose of such investments quickly, it could be difficult to dispose of such investments on favorable terms. The Fund may not be able to find a buyer for such investments and, even if a buyer is found, the Fund may have to sell the investments at a substantial loss. Any such outcomes would have a material adverse effect on the Fund’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

If the Fund does not maintain its status as a BDC, it would be subject to regulation as a registered closed-end management investment company under the 1940 Act. As a registered closed-end management investment company, the Fund would be subject to substantially more regulatory restrictions under the 1940 Act which would significantly decrease its operating flexibility.

As a Public Company, the Fund is Subject to Regulations Not Applicable to Private Companies, Such as Provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Efforts to Comply with Such Regulations will Involve Significant Expenditures, and Non-Compliance with Such Regulations May Adversely Affect the Fund. As a public company, we are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the related rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC. Following the transition period established by rules of the SEC, our management is required to report on our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We are required to review on an annual basis our internal control over financial reporting, and on a quarterly and annual basis to evaluate and disclose changes in our internal control over financial reporting. As a relatively new company, developing and maintaining an effective system of internal controls may require significant expenditures, which may negatively impact our financial performance and our ability to make distributions. This process also will result in a diversion of our management’s time and attention. We cannot be certain of when our evaluation, testing and remediation actions will be completed or the impact of the same on our operations. In addition, we may be unable to ensure that the process is effective or that our internal controls over financial reporting are or will be effective in a timely manner. In the event that we are unable to develop or maintain an effective system of internal controls and maintain or achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related rules, we may be adversely affected.

Our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until there is a public market for our Common Shares, which is not expected to occur.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Related to Being an “Emerging Growth Company”. We are and will remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act until the earlier of (a) the last day of the fiscal year (i) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion, or (ii) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our shares that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the date of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, and (b) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three- year period. For so long as we remain an “emerging growth company,” we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We cannot predict if investors will find our shares less attractive because we will rely on some or all of these exemptions. If some investors find our shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our shares and our share price may be more volatile.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the 1933 Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards.

The Fund is Subject to Risks Arising from Compliance with the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest. Broker-dealers must comply with Regulation Best Interest, which, among other requirements, enhances the existing standard of conduct for broker-dealers and natural persons who are associated persons of a broker-dealer when recommending to a retail customer any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities to a retail customer. Regulation Best Interest imposes a duty of care for broker-dealers to evaluate reasonably available alternatives in the best interests of their clients. There are likely alternatives to us that are reasonably available to you, through your broker or otherwise, and those alternatives may be less costly or have a lower investment risk. Among other alternatives, listed BDCs may be reasonable alternatives to an investment in our Common Shares, and may feature characteristics like lower cost, less complexity, and lesser or different risks. Investments in listed securities also often involve nominal or zero commissions at the time of initial purchase. The impact of Regulation Best Interest on broker-dealers participating in our offering cannot be determined at this time, but it may negatively impact whether broker-dealers and their associated persons recommend this offering to retail customers. If Regulation Best Interest reduces our ability to raise capital in this offering, it would harm our ability to create a diversified portfolio of investments and achieve our investment objective and would result in our fixed operating costs representing a larger percentage of our gross income.

Under Regulation Best Interest, high cost, high risk and complex products may require greater scrutiny by broker-dealers and their salespersons before they recommend such products. There are likely alternatives to us that are reasonably available to you, through your broker or otherwise, and those alternatives may be less costly or have lower investment risk. Among other alternatives, listed BDCs may be reasonable alternatives to an investment in our Common Shares, and may feature characteristics like lower cost, less complexity, and lesser or different risks. Investments in listed securities also often involve nominal or zero commissions at the time of initial purchase. Currently, there is no administrative or case law interpreting Regulation Best Interest and the full scope of its applicability on brokers participating in our offering cannot be determined at this time.